Drawing for CERSAIE

USPTO serial 79005101

CERSAIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307398Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERSAIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KATHLEEN A. COSTIGAN

KATHLEEN A. COSTIGAN HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.One Rockefeller Plaza, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011[ Street lamps; lamps; electric lamps and headlights; heaters for heating installations; burners for heating installations; bathtubs; showers; taps; air-conditioners; kitchen appliances, namely, ovens, cooking stoves, cookers, gas cookers and gas stoves ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Ceramic tiles for ornamental tiling and coating; natural and artificial stones; bricks; non-metal tiles; and non-metal roof tiles [ cement; non agricultural lime for construction purposes; mortar; plaster and gravel; sandstone and cement pipes; asphalt, pitch and bitumen; monuments of stone; non-metal chimneys; semi-worked wood; building timber; non-metal beams; non-metal pins; wooden boards; wood veneers; plywood; common glass for building ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020[ Furniture mirrors; picture frames; plastic furniture; metal furniture; furniture for camping; elastic mattresses; and pillows ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021[ Frying pans; plates; glass beverage ware; combs; sponges; buckets; bowls; electric and non-electric toothbrushes;toothpicks; brushes; material for brush making; steel-wool; raw and semi-processed glass; and bottles sold empty ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 8, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 25, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 11, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 11, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 9, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 5, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 1, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 22, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 1, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 1, 201471.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 9, 2014EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2013PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Oct 22, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 15, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 15, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 24, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 7, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 11, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 3, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance