Drawing for OSSÉ

USPTO serial 79005136

OSSÉ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3073715Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OSSÉ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J0HN S. EGBERT

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC412 MAIN STREET7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eye glasses; sun glasses; contact lenses and their cases; spectacle cases; and accessories and pieces for eye glasses and sun glasses sold therewithSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
014[ Precious metal alloys; jewelry boxes of precious metal; jewelry; precious stones; and horological and chronometric instruments and cases therefor ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035[ Retail store featuring clothing ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 10, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 4, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 4, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 26, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 12, 2013INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 1, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 2, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 2, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Dec 2, 201171.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 2, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 201171AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Sep 19, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance