USPTO serial 79005136
OSSÉ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2006
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OSSÉ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J0HN S. EGBERT
JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC412 MAIN STREET7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Eye glasses; sun glasses; contact lenses and their cases; spectacle cases; and accessories and pieces for eye glasses and sun glasses sold therewith | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | [ Precious metal alloys; jewelry boxes of precious metal; jewelry; precious stones; and horological and chronometric instruments and cases therefor ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [ Retail store featuring clothing ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by MERVE OPTIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named OSSÉ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 12, 2013 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |