USPTO serial 79005150
PERFECT DRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFECT DRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BE
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
BE
BE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal barrels; metal taps for barrels; metal containers for storing, packing and supplying beer | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Apparatus for drawing up beer and other beverages; beer pumps; apparatus for preparing beverages, not included in other classes; parts of afore-mentioned goods, not included in other classes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Taps, not of metal; containers, not of metal, for storing, packing and supplying beer | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations of making beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages (except beers) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by InBev S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERBREW S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named PERFECT DRAFT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |