USPTO serial 79005250
QUICK SWITCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUICK SWITCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day, Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR PROCESSING PLASTICS, NAMELY EXTRUSION MACHINES, EXTRUDERS, WORM EXTRUDERS; ELECTRIC AND HYDRAULIC DRIVES FOR WORM EXTRUDERS, BARREL EXTRUDERS; EXTRUSION MACHINES, NAMELY EXTRUSION MACHINES COMPRISING FEEDING EQUIPMENT FOR FEEDING IN PLASTICS, NAMELY FEEDING IN DUROPLASTICS; EXTRUDERS, MOLDING APPLIANCES, NAMELY PIPE AND PROFILE MOLDING APPLIANCES; DIMENSIONAL CHANGE APPLIANCES, NAMELY EXTRACTION APPLIANCES; SEPARATING APPLIANCES AND CUTTING APPLIANCES FOR PRODUCING PIPES, PROFILES, PLATES AND GRANULATES MADE OF PLASTIC OR MADE OF PLASTIC MIXED WITH OTHER SUBSTANCES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLS FOR PLASTIC PROCESSING MACHINES, NAMELY FOR EXTRUSION MACHINES AND EXTRUDERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS TO CONTROL PLASTIC PROCESSING MACHINES, NAMELY EXTRUDERS AND EXTRUSION MACHINES; DATA CARRIERS CONTAINING COMPUTER PROGRAMS TO CONTROL PLASTIC PROCESSING MACHINES, NAMELY EXTRUDERS AND EXTRUSION MACHINES; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING, SIGNALING AND MONITORING PLASTIC PROCESSING MACHINES, NAMELY EXTRUDERS AND EXTRUSION MACHINES, DOSING EQUIPMENT AND CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE OF EXTRUDERS OF PLASTIC PROCESSING MACHINES, NAMELY EXTRUSION MACHINES AND EXTRUDERS; OVER HAULING WORN AND/OR DAMAGED WORM EXTRUDERS; MAINTENANCE OF USED EXTRUDERS, MAINTENANCE OF ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC AND PRECISION MECHANICAL MANUFACTURE MACHINES OF HEAVY ENGINEERING AND HYDRAULIC PRODUCTS FOR PLASTIC PROCESSING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |