Drawing for CAMP

USPTO serial 79005260

CAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223168Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major

Scott J. Major Millen White Zelano & Branigan, PC2200 Clarendon Blvd., 14th FloorArlington, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Ice axes for climbing, ice axes, namely, hammer axes for climbing, ice hammers, hand operated hammers for driving pitons and pegs, sport knives, snow shovels, hand equipment for ascending and for descending for climbing and caving, namely, climbing and caving ascenders, pickaxes for firefightersACTIVE—
009Climbing and caving helmets, batteries, namely, mountain and caving batteries, altimeters, directional compasses, sport goggles for use in mountaineering, life belts for mountain climbing, rescue blankets, electric or electronic sensors for sensing avalanchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 16, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 27, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 21, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 26, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 26, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 23, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2006GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance