Drawing for SARI ZEYBEK

USPTO serial 79005279

SARI ZEYBEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3073717Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
DWYER, SEAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SARI ZEYBEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wines, sparkling wines, fruit wines, sparkling fruit wines, distilled spirits, brandies, liqueursSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 5, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 2, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 8, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 23, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance