USPTO serial 79005317
SEASPIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3079842Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEASPIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Lyhus
John E. Lyhus Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP120 South LaSalle StreetSuite 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric motors for propulsion mechanisms | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic controllers; power supply systems, namely batteries and power supply units; gyroscopes; depth sensors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Underwater sliding bodies, namely torpedoes, shells and shell-sections for underwater sliding bodies namely, stem section, propulsion section, electronic section, power section, head section with warhead or exercise head and sonar head, underwater rocket propulsion units | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 013 | Warhead with explosive charge, exercise head without explosive charge, launchers for underwater sliding bodies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TKMS ATLAS ELEKTRONIK GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ATLAS ELEKTRONIK GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ATLAS ELEKTRONIK GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ATLAS ELEKTRONIK GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Similar marks named SEASPIDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |