USPTO serial 79005324
LUMIQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMIQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education; training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities; cinematographic production and post production services; production of 3D animations (three-dimensional); creation and production of cinematographic films, videotapes and movies, also for rental; cinematographic and television studios services; radio and television broadcasting, creation, production and conducting of shows and cinematographic, theatrical, musical, radio and television events; subtitling services; script services; audio and video recording services; training services; photographic services; conducting and presentation of live performances and exhibitions; academy services, educational and training schools and centers; providing of infrastructures for cinematography, theatre, music and recreational and entertaining activities, and rental of related equipments, systems and installations; recreational and entertaining services, also supplied on-line; edition and publication also in electronic format and on-line; creation, organization, conducting and running of exhibitions, shows, events, symposiums, meetings and workshops for cultural, educational or recreational purposes; amusement park services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design services relating thereto; design and development of computer hardware and software; services of design, maintenance, rental, updating and analysis of software systems; services of design, rental, updating and analysis of hardware systems; consulting services related to hardware and software; creation and maintenance of web sites for third parties; graphic arts design services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 12, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |