Drawing for FLUIDFOCUS

USPTO serial 79005388

FLUIDFOCUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLUIDFOCUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward W. Goodman, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken

EDWARD W GOODMAN PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORPPO BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording and reproduction of sound or image, namely, cameras and telephones; variable focus optical liquid lenses.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 21, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance