CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LES FUMÉES BLANCHES

USPTO serial 79005420

LES FUMÉES BLANCHES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3082948Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 18, 2006
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LES FUMÉES BLANCHES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce S. Londa

Bruce S. Londa Norris McLaughlin, P.A.7 Times Square21st FloorNew York, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033White winesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 1, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 3, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 25, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 16, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 16, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 16, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 15, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 25, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 25, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 18, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 18, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 19, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 13, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance