USPTO serial 79005447
REPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3041991Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-79618 Rheinfelden, DE
D-79618 Rheinfelden, DE
D-79618 Rheinfelden, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Afschineh Latifi
AFSCHINEH LATIFI TUCKER & LATIFI, LLP160 EAST 84TH STREETSUITE 5-ENEW YORK, NY 10028Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Carbon ramming pastes for use with carbon linings in electrolysis cells | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |