Drawing for SAVY SPARKLE

USPTO serial 79005476

SAVY SPARKLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3082949Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 18, 2006
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAVY SPARKLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells, PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 12, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 6, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 2, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 13, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance