USPTO serial 79005479
ACTISIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3023907Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2005
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTISIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
B-9070 Destelbergen, BE
B-9070 Destelbergen, BE
B-9070 Destelbergen, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Geller
12100 Wilshire Bl., Suite 500Los Angeles, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS USED IN AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE AND FORESTRY, NAMELY, PLANT STRENGTHENING AND PLANT GROWTH REGULATING PREPARATIONS IN THE NATURE OF CHEMICALS FOR PREVENTION OF INFECTION BY MICROBES AS WELL AS FERTILIZERS, ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED CHEMICALS, FOR REINFORCING EPIDERMAL STRUCTURES, UPGRADING THE IMMUNITY TO STRESS AND PROMOTING PHYSIOLOGICAL AND GROWTH REGULATING PROCESSES; AND PLANT STRENGTHENING CHEMICALS FOR THE PREVENTION OF INFECTION BY MICROBES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2013 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |