USPTO serial 79005485
SOGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3051079Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2006
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RAISINGHANI RAISINGHANI, SATISH WADHUMAL
ES
Other trademarks owned by RAISINGHANI RAISINGHANI, SATISH WADHUMAL
RAISINGHANI RAISINGHANI, SATISH WADHUMAL
ES
Other trademarks owned by RAISINGHANI RAISINGHANI, SATISH WADHUMAL
RAISINGHANI RAISINGHANI, SATISH WADHUMAL
ES
Other trademarks owned by RAISINGHANI RAISINGHANI, SATISH WADHUMAL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric can openers, vacuum cleaners, electric whisks for household purposes, electric coffee mills for household use, cutting machines, electric food processors, sausage machines, ironing machines for pressing clothes, electric meat choppers, compressors for machines, sewing machines, electric kitchen machines, namely, electric food blenders, electric mixers for household purposes, electric food slicers and electric pasta makers for domestic use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Non-electric can openers, electric or non-electric razors, beard clippers, electric and non-electric hair clippers for personal use, vegetable slicers, electric or non-electric depilation appliances, hand-operated vegetable choppers, non-electric meat chopping tools | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Air conditioners, heaters for baths, barbecues, electric coffee machines, electric coffee roasters, freezers, electric radiators not for motor vehicles or engines, electric gas lighters, electric stoves, electric deep friers, refrigerators, electric fruit roasters, electric kettles, microwave ovens for culinary use, electric pressure cookers, electric toasters for bread, electric baker's ovens, electric grills, barbecue grills, solar heating panels, coolers for furnaces, refrigerating containers, electric curling lamps, hair dryers for household purposes, electric fans, electric yogurt makers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAISINGHANI RAISINGHANI, SATISH WADHUMAL
- Other trademarks owned by RAISINGHANI RAISINGHANI, SATISH WADHUMAL
- Other trademarks owned by RAISINGHANI RAISINGHANI, SATISH WADHUMAL
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named SOGO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |