Drawing for SCHAFFNER

USPTO serial 79005501

SCHAFFNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3011643Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 1, 2005
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCHAFFNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randolph E. Digges, III

Randolph E. Digges, III Rankin, Hill & Clark LLP38210 Glenn AvenueWilloughby, OH 44094-7808UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical, electromechanical and electronic components, apparatus and systems, namely, [ radio frequency interference meters and operating software therefor, ] self-inducting coils, filter chokes, RFI filters, standard and special heat sinks for use in computers, [ capacitors, ] section filters for ensuring electromagnetic measurement of switched-mode power supplies and other data transmissions, section transformers, pulse transformers for data transmissions, [ simulators for radio frequency interference and high frequency disturbances, analyzers for checking the electromagnetic resistance of electronic apparatus subjected to electrostatic discharges, voltage surges and high-frequency disturbances, testing systems comprised of the above specified components for switched-mode power supplies, and DC to DC converters ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011[ Heat sinks for use in electronic and electric applications ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Technical consultancy in the field of electromagnetic compatibility, namely, services of analysis and measurement of electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic interference, electromagnetic emissions and electromagnetic immunity; technical consultancy in the filed of electromagnetic compatibility, namely, services of examination of electromagnetic emissions and immunity against disturbance of systems and apparatus; technical consulting in the field of measuring, filtering and suppressing electromagnetic emissions and electromagnetic disturbancesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 7, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD—
Dec 18, 2019EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 23, 2016INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
May 15, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 15, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 15, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 9, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 27, 2013INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 11, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 3, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2011NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 201171.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 3, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Aug 3, 2011XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
Jul 13, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 9, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 1, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 9, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance