USPTO serial 79005534
HOMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical, electrotechnical and electronic apparatus and devices (included in this class); electrical devices for recording, emission, transmission, switching, reception, reproduction and processing of sounds, signals, characters and/or images and for the integration of voice, image, text, data, multimedia, full-motion video communications in networks, devices for recording, processing, sending, transmission, switching, storage and output of messages, information and data; communications computers, software; optical, electrotechnical and electronic equipment for voice, image, text, data, multimedia and full-motion video communications technology, especially for voice data communication, telephones, videophones, voice boxes, dialing devices, domestic telephone systems, private automatic branch exchanges; photocopiers; telecommunication networks consisting of exchange and transmission equipment, individual modules and components of such equipment such as power supply units, transmission media such as telecommunication cables and optical fibres and pertinent connection elements; wireless transmission media such as infrared and radio communication equipment; parts of all aforementioned apparatus and devices (included in this class); installations composed of a combination of the aforementioned apparatus and devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Operation and technical administration of telecommunication system and telecommunication networks, in particular of company and carrier networks (voice, data and mobile telephone networks) by means of electronic transmission, electronic storage and retrieval of data, images, sounds and documents via computer terminals, electronic mailing, fax transmissions, transmission of short messages, mailbox functions, call forwarding and conference calls; renting of telecommunication appliances and devices and of telecommunication networks; technical consultancy in the setting-up and operation of telecommunication systems and telecommunication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development, planning and design-engineering of telecommunication and information processing services and facilities and telecommunication networks and pertinent facilities and parts; development, generation and renting of data processing programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2006 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |