Drawing for COMAT

USPTO serial 79005554

COMAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3139239Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 5, 2006
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside PlazaSuite 1500Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools for use in the production of boxes, folding boxes, covers and their blanks, namely, die cutters and structural parts therefore; cutting machines for use in the production of boxes, folding boxes, covers, and their blanks, namely die cutting machines and structural parts therefore; machine parts for use in the production of boxes, folding boxes, covers and their blanks, namely die cuttersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009[ Magnets; magnetic disks and tapes, namely, prerecorded magnetic tapes and disks featuring the manufacture of boxes, folding boxes, covers and their blanks made from carton or corrugated boards boxes ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 21, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 21, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 21, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2017INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
May 26, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 26, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 26, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 23, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2015CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 10, 2015CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 15, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 15, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 1, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 17, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 27, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2014INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 6, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2012NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 201215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Sep 6, 201271.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 31, 201215AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Jul 31, 201271AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Jul 31, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2012E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 24, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 13, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 5, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 31, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance