Drawing for LANCER

USPTO serial 79005593

LANCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3165365Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 31, 2006
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LANCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Military aircraftSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Repair of aircraft, repair of component parts and equipment for aircraftSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042scientific and industrial research; computer programming for others, namely, programming calculators; technology consultation in the field of aeronautical engineeringSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 19, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 5, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 6, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 15, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jan 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance