Drawing for LOGIPRINT

USPTO serial 79005606

LOGIPRINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3051086Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOGIPRINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam D. Trudell

Miriam D. Trudell Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 Broadway, Suite 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016stationery; printed matter, namely, books and magazines in the field of the printing industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Mail order services featuring printed publications produced in offset and digital printing technique, books, magazines, name cards, letterhead, labels, advertising flyers, rubber stamps and invitation cardsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
039[ Delivery of goods by truck, air and rail ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040printing servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Graphic arts designing; computer programmingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 21, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 21, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 20, 2012C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 20, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 23, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance