CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OKOUMAL

USPTO serial 79005649

OKOUMAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3087815Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 2, 2006
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with OKOUMAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Smith

Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP600 Vine StreetSuite 2800CINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for making perfumery and cosmeticsACTIVE—
003[ Perfumery and cosmetics ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 4, 2017INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 4, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 31, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 31, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 26, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2012C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 26, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 26, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 20, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 30, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 20, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 30, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance