Drawing for GREENLINK

USPTO serial 79005665

GREENLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3071196Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 21, 2006
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE

CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical apparatus and instruments for use in motor vehicles, namely, electric cables; conduits and cables for handling electrical current; power extension cords; power extension cords for connecting other interconnecting cables, electric relay boxes, electronic battery chargers, engine block heaters for preheating engine coolant, oil sump pan heaters, interior heaters, and windshield defrostersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 10, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 8, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 22, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 20, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance