Drawing for HOT BLADE

USPTO serial 79005670

HOT BLADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3095802Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 23, 2006
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOT BLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert F. Zielinski, Esq.

Robert F. Zielinski, Esq. Law Offices of Robert F. ZielinskiOne South Broad StreetSuite 1500Philadelphia, PA 19107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal blanks and disks coated with anti-adhesive substances for use in manufacturing pots, pans and other cooking utensilsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Non-electric cooking utensils with anti-adhesive coating, namely-- frying pans, stew-pans, stew pots, pressure cookers, oven casserole dishes, oven roasting dishesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 26, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 26, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 11, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 4, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance