Drawing for VEQUATAL

USPTO serial 79005676

VEQUATAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEQUATAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, therapeutic preparationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 16, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2023XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2023XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 4, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 23, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 12, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 23, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 2, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 1, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 25, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 22, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 3, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance