USPTO serial 79005731
TRUMAFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3032502Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2005
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUMAFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel D. Leviton
Joel D. Leviton Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Laser processing machines for melting, sintering, material de positioning, removing, surface treatment and/or re melting with laser beams; Current generators namely direct-current generators, medium and high-frequency generators | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Non-medical lasers; light guides for lasers; Electrical controllers for machine tools for the treatment of materials, for laser processing machines, for lasers and/or for laser systems; sensors, detectors, electrical and electronical devices for the remote control of industrial material processing machines; Computer programmes and computer software for use in operating machine tools for the treatment of materials, for laser processing machines, for lasers and/or for laser systems; Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity in connection with machine tools, namely switch mode power supplies, high-frequency changeover switches, matching networks, electrical converters and inverters, frequency converters; power supplies for electrical devices; Scanners; telescopes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Technological and technical consultancy in the field of Laser material processing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Organization and holding of conferences, congresses, meetings and workshops in the field of laser material processing;Providing training and further education in the field of laser material processing in the nature of course of instruction, course of lectures, seminars, practical on-the-job training,expert education with final examination, and workshops | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trumpf GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Trumpf GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Trumpf GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TRUMAFORM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |