USPTO serial 79005780
TALISMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAN, REBECCAH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TALISMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Wasnofski, Jr.
Robert M. Wasnofski, Jr. Dorsey & Whitney LLP51 West 52nd StreetNew York, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Horological and chronometric instruments, namely watches, wristwatches, chronometers, clocks, table clocks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRANCK MULLER WATCHLAND SA
- Other trademarks owned by FMTM Distribution Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by FMTM distribution Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named TALISMAN
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |