USPTO serial 79005790
FLEXITEEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3162799Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2006
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FLEXITEEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Scott Evans
J. Scott Evans STOBBS214 W. Tremont AveSuite 303Charlotte, NC 28203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Synthetic marine deck flooring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Flexiteek International AS
- Other trademarks owned by Flexiteek International AS
- Other trademarks owned by Flexiteek International AS
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named FLEXITEEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |