Drawing for WIRE DÜSSELDORF

USPTO serial 79005881

WIRE DÜSSELDORF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3063857Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 2006
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with WIRE DÜSSELDORF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KLAUS P. STOFFEL

KLAUS P. STOFFEL LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP100 S. JEFFERSON ROADSUITE 202WHIPPANY, NJ 07981

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING CONGRESSES AND CONFERENCES FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATION PURPOSESACTIVE—
042PLANNING AND ORGANIZING FAIR SHOWS AND EXHIBITIONS IN THE FIELD OF WIRE AND CABLEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 25, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 16, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 18, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 2, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 25, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 25, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 31, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2005CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance