Drawing for M&G

USPTO serial 79005901

M&G

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3060510Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 21, 2006
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M&G?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia I. Reding

Patricia I. Reding Faegre Baker Daniels LLP90 South Seventh Street2200 Wells Fargo CenterMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Pens, [ note books; folders for papers; office requisites, except furniture namely, envelope sealing machines; ] writing instruments; correcting tapes for type; correcting fluids; [ jackets for papers; stationery; stationery writing cases; adhesives and glues for stationery or household purposes; self-adhesive tapes for stationery or household purposes; rubber erasers; writing paper; and albums ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 18, 2013CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 14, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 30, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 30, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 30, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 3, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 3, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 27, 2011CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 27, 2011CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 18, 2011PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 30, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 14, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance