Drawing for COSMINO CONTE BRACHETTI - PERETTI TOLENTINO - ITALY

USPTO serial 79005932

COSMINO CONTE BRACHETTI - PERETTI TOLENTINO - ITALY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3085601Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2006
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COSMINO CONTE BRACHETTI - PERETTI TOLENTINO - ITALY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY B. SLADKUS

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. Jeffrey B. Sladkus, LLC1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 26, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 11, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 20, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance