USPTO serial 79005963
LIQUICAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3029452Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LIQUICAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Gurfinkel
Daniel M. Gurfinkel Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring apparatus, namely, level transmitters for measuring pressure, filling level, and flow rate, and electric and hydrostatic probes, sensors and radio transmitters for measuring the filling level of fluids or bulk materials in a container or tank and transmitting the same; software for use in processing measuring signals by level transmitters or process control computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Endress+Hauser SE+Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Endress + Hauser GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Endress + Hauser GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LIQUICAP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 8, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |