Drawing for DESERT COMBAT

USPTO serial 79005979

DESERT COMBAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3073728Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESERT COMBAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RALPH H. LANE

GROTH & CO KBBOX 6107, SE-102 32 STOCKHOLMSWEDEN

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 27, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 27, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 12, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 11, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 22, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 22, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 10, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 19, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance