Drawing for MIDSUMMER DREAM

USPTO serial 79006009

MIDSUMMER DREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3165367Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 31, 2006
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIDSUMMER DREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE B. SEYLER

JULIE B SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripherals, namely mouse pads; holders for compact discs, computer game cartridges, computer game cassettes and computer game tapes; video game cartridges, video game cassettes; pre-recorded audio cassettes and tapes featuring music and prerecorded video cassettes and tapes featuring motion picture films and soundtracks; prerecorded discs featuring music and motion picture sound tracks; CD-Rom and DVD programs featuring music and motion picture sound tracks; computer operating system software; pre-recorded computer software programs featuring music and motion picture sound tracks, interactive multi-media software programs for entertainment; interactive multi-media software for playing games; magnets, sunglasses, kaleidoscopes, and 3-D reels and viewersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 12, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 12, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 15, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 14, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance