USPTO serial 79006051
LA ROSE DE ROSINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3177194Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA ROSE DE ROSINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LES PARFUMS DE ROSINE société à responsabilité limitée
F-60350 MARTIMONT CROUTOY, FR
Other trademarks owned by LES PARFUMS DE ROSINE société à responsabilité limitée
LES PARFUMS DE ROSINE société à responsabilité limitée
F-60350 MARTIMONT CROUTOY, FR
Other trademarks owned by LES PARFUMS DE ROSINE société à responsabilité limitée
LES PARFUMS DE ROSINE société à responsabilité limitée
F-60350 MARTIMONT CROUTOY, FR
Other trademarks owned by LES PARFUMS DE ROSINE société à responsabilité limitée
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena S. Mishev
Milena S. Mishev McCarthy Fingar LLP11 Martine Avenue12th FloorWhite Plains, NY 10606-1934Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes, cosmetics, toilet soaps, personal deodorants, hair shampoos and hair lotions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LES PARFUMS DE ROSINE société à responsabilité limitée
- Other trademarks owned by LES PARFUMS DE ROSINE société à responsabilité limitée
- Other trademarks owned by LES PARFUMS DE ROSINE société à responsabilité limitée
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LA ROSE DE ROSINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |