Drawing for BEISSBARTH

USPTO serial 79006058

BEISSBARTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3042021Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEISSBARTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP1200 Seventeenth Street NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DEVICES AND MACHINES FOR SERVICING VEHICLES, NAMELY WHEEL BALANCING DEVICES, WHEEL BALANCING MACHINES, DEVICES AND MACHINES FOR MEASURING THE POSITION OF AUTOMOBILE WHEELS, DEVICES AND MACHINES FOR CHECKING BRAKES, DEVICES AND MACHINES FOR MOUNTING AND CHANGING TIRES, DEVICES AND MACHINES FOR CHECKING SHOCK ABSORBERS, DEVICES FOR TESTING COMBUSTION GASES, DEVICES FOR TESTING ENGINESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 20, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 10, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 14, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 26, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 26, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 22, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 17, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 17, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 16, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 3, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2006RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 30, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance