Drawing for RIPPLEPRINT

USPTO serial 79006097

RIPPLEPRINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3066137Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2006
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIPPLEPRINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. McGinley

J. ALLISON STRICKLAND SNR Denton US LLPP.O. Box 061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Road surfacing materials, namely thermoplastics consisting of hot applied, polymer modified, synthetic bitumen-based compounds incorporating graded rubber and granite aggregates reinforced with metal and glass fiber; materials for making, repairing, coating and marking roads, paths, runways and bridges, namely thermoplastics consisting of hot applied, polymer modified, synthetic bitumen-based compounds incorporating graded rubber and granite aggregates reinforced with metal and glass fiber for creating traffic calming devices and gatewaysSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 5, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 13, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 18, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 15, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 13, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2005ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance