USPTO serial 79006100
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tara A. Branscom
Tara A. Branscom Thomas | Horstemeyer, LLP3200 Windy Hill Road, SESuite 1600EAtlanta, GA 30339| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ band saw machines; ] machine tools, namely, saw blades, [ circular saw blades and ] band saw blades as parts of saw machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | [ hand tools, namely, hand saws; hand tools, namely, saw blades and band saw blades as parts of hand saws ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |