USPTO serial 79006103
NANOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3362602Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with NANOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KLAUS P. STOFFEL
KLAUS P. STOFFEL LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Drive systems comprising motorized drives that allow for precise control of the movement of a linear actuator using piezoelectric properties; mechanical guiding systems comprising linear motors for single-axis and multi-axis positioning systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, precision micro positioning systems, that are, motorized drive systems, namely, power supply units, control units, position controls, speed controls, force controls, and analog and digital interface modules, that precisely control the location and movement of stages, namely, wafer holders and transporters, using piezoelectric properties; single-axis and multi-axis actuating and positioning systems with piezo-drive systems, comprising linear motors for microscopes, stages, namely, wafer holders and transporters for wafer handling that may be controllably motorized using piezoelectric properties, and linear stages, namely, camera part holders and transporters for precision movement of camera parts; piezo-tilting platforms for optical elements and active optics, namely, motorized platforms using piezoelectric properties for holding, transporting, and tilting optical elements and active optics; electronic data processing systems, comprising a mechanical guiding system for more axis movement, namely, power supply units, control units, position controls, speed controls, force controls, and analog and digital interface modules for mechanical guidance using piezoelectric properties; computer and computer software for operating actuating and positioning systems; electric controllable mechanical shifting equipment, namely, precision positioning systems and actuators and control units for such equipments; electronic integrated displacement sensors for mechanical positioning systems using piezoelectric properties; encapsulated and unencapsulated piezomultilayer-actuators; piezo-engines, namely, power supply units, control units, position controls, speed controls, force controls, and analog and digital interface modules using piezoelectric properties for precise adjustment in optics, semiconductor handling and inspection systems and for precision alignment and handling systems; piezo-ultrasonic transducers; micro positioning stages, namely, motorized wafer holders and transporters using piezoelectric properties for optical waveguides and fiber optics; multi mode switches for optical waveguides; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, spectrometers, optical and semiconductor inspection systems comprising a mechanical guiding system using piezoelectric properties, namely, power supply units, control units, position controls, speed controls, force controls, and analog and digital interface modules; blank optical data storage carriers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of computer software for piezo-electronic drive systems for single-axis and multi-axis positioning systems as well as for precision micro positioning systems including for controlling of micro positioning stages for optical waveguides and fiber optics; development of piezo-electric drive systems for single-axis and multi-axis positioning systems, piezo-tilting platforms for optical elements and active optics, encapsulated and unencapsulated piezo multilayer actuators, piezo engines, piezo ultrasonic transducers, micro positioning stages for optical waveguides and fiber optics as well as multi mode switch for optical waveguides; research in the field of technique, namely, development of precise actuators and sensors for measurement of precis emotions, including development of electronic systems and software for such components, * exclusively in the fields of piezoelectric motors and engines, the micro-positioning system and light wave conducting technics *; technical measurement evaluation in the optics and semiconductor industry and in the field of industry of precision alignment and handling systems, * exclusively in the fields of piezoelectric motors and engines, the micro-positioning system and light wave conducting technics * | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by piezosystem jena GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by piezosystem jena GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by piezosystem jena GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NANOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |