USPTO serial 79006116
GIANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 7, 2006
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE M. THOMAS
GEORGE M THOMAS THOMAS, KAYDEN HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY LLP100 GALLERIA PKWY NW STE 1750ATLANTA, GA 30339-5948UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by WIKUS-Sägenfabrik Wilhelm H. Kullmann GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named GIANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |