Drawing for MIVITALITY

USPTO serial 79006192

MIVITALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3042022Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIVITALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles W. Fallow

CHARLES W FALLOW SHOEMAKER & MATTARE10 POST OFFICE RD STE 100SILVER SPRING, MD 20910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional, dietary and herbal supplements, meal replacement shakes, all being organic natural therapeutic preparations; therapeutic preparations for the bath; medicated confectionary; food for babies; medicinal and therapeutic herbs, infusions, oils, roots and teaSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 5, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 10, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 13, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 15, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance