Drawing for Serial No. 79006285

USPTO serial 79006285

Serial No. 79006285

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3087818Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 2, 2006
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79006285?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Camille M. Miller

Camille M. Miller Cozen O'Connor, PC1900 Market StreetIP GroupPhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, cocoa, tea, drinks based on tea, green tea, instant tea, granulated tea, tea flavoured with lemon, vitamin teaSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 8, 2013IRIVIRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 12, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 6, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 6, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 18, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 22, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 23, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance