Drawing for VARILUX LIBERTY

USPTO serial 79006292

VARILUX LIBERTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3060514Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 21, 2006
Examiner
MORRIS, ALINA S.
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VARILUX LIBERTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Correcting lenses for eyeglasses; spectacle glasses (including plastic lenses), glass lenses, corrective lenses, progressive lenses, polarising lenses, tinted lenses, light-sensitive lenses, photochromic lenses, processed lenses, coated lenses, non-reflecting lenses, semi-finished lenses; spectacle lens blanks, semi-finished spectacle lens blanksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 30, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 30, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 13, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 3, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 14, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance