Drawing for LAURASTAR

USPTO serial 79006323

LAURASTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3082965Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 18, 2006
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LAURASTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen Pachol

Stephen Pachol Nixon & Vanderhye901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorARLINGTON, VA 22203United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric domestic ironing appliances comprising a steam generating device; electric and steam ironsACTIVE—
011Steam generating apparatus particularly steam generatorsACTIVE—
021Ironing boardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 9, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 7, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 13, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 16, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 16, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 16, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 17, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 25, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 25, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 18, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance