Drawing for NOVAMACH

USPTO serial 79006345

NOVAMACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3051119Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOVAMACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Bergsman

Nicole M. Meyer Dickinson Wright PLLC1875 Eye Street, N.W.Suite 1200Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hoists, cranes, winches; Lifting apparatus, namely, plate lifting clamps, namely, clamps for use in conjunction with hoists and cranes to vertically lift and rotate objects; hydraulic lift tables, electric elevating work platforms, lifting apparatus, namely, chain hoists, lever hoists, electric chain hoists, hydraulic jacks, power operated jacks, conveyors, hydraulic hand held tools, namely, hydraulic jacks and hydraulic hammers, self adjusting load elevators, pallet loaders, tower cranes, pallet stackersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Tailboard lifts as part of land vehicles, fork lift trucks, accumulator driven carriers, namely, electric pallet trucks, electric platform trucks, and electric stackers, safety belts for vehicle seats, goods handling carts for vehicles, casters for trolleys, hand carts, two-wheeled trolleys, lifting cars, vehicle seats, platform trucks, shopping carts, cargo trailers, luggage carriers for vehicles, dump trucksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 20, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 14, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance