Drawing for SLYTECH

USPTO serial 79006347

SLYTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3046425Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2006
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLYTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelry, namely, cufflinks, tie pins, rings, bracelets, earrings, necklaces and brooches; watches, chronometers, wall clocks, watch straps, boxes of precious metal for watches and jewelrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 2, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 14, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 20, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 4, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 2, 2008CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jul 24, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2007DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 7, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 26, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 2, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance