Drawing for LOVEDOOR

USPTO serial 79006355

LOVEDOOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3202246Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOVEDOOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew P. Cernota

Andrew P. Cernota Maine Cernota & Rardin547 Amherst Street, 3rd FloorNASHUA, NH 03063UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optics, namely, magnifying glasses; telescopes; eyeglass cords; eyeglass cases; optics, namely, spectacles; spectacle glasses; eyeglass frames; containers for contact lenses; spectacle cases; sunglassesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 2, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 25, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 25, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 6, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 6, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 25, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2006RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 18, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance