USPTO serial 79006363
CHROME LEGEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3133216Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2006
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CHROME LEGEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume [ , toilet water, eau-de-cologne, after shave lotion, non-medicated products for baths, namely bath foam, bath gel, bath oil, deodorants for personal use, perfumed soaps, perfumed talcum powder, scented cosmetic creams for face and body, cosmetic milks for face and body, non-medicated lotions and gels for skin care, essential oils for personal use; cosmetics; hair lotions ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LORIS AZZARO B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Loris Azzaro B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Loris Azzaro B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by AZZARO BEAUTE
- Other trademarks owned by L'OREAL
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named CHROME LEGEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |