Drawing for COINTREAU

USPTO serial 79006403

COINTREAU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3093362Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 16, 2006
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with COINTREAU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 Third Avenue, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, cordials and liqueursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2025LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 12, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 31, 2024LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 28, 2022NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Aug 12, 2021NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Apr 16, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 22, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 15, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jun 15, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 28, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 4, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance