USPTO serial 79006430
SANOKOTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3079852Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SANOKOTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Gurfinkel
Daniel M. Gurfinkel Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Natural and artificial fertilizers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely, fresh fruits and fresh vegetables; seeds for agricultural purposes, seeds with a protective coating, for agricultural purposes; live plants and cut live flowers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Incotec Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Incotec Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Incotec Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named SANOKOTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2012 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | IRRE | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL REQUIRES EXAMINER REVIEW | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |