USPTO serial 79006453
TIORMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3120855Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 2006
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIORMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia C. Archer
Julia C. Archer Enns & Archer LLP939 Burke StreetWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical products for treatment of diarrhoea in adults and children for the treatment of viral and infectious diseases, medicines for human purposes, namely medicines for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases; biological preparations for medical or veterinary purposes, sedatives, clinical-pharmaceutical products for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases; chemical preparations for medical or veterinary use, dietetic foods adapted for medical use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - SEE PUBLIC NOTE | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |