Drawing for E-TREES.JAPAN

USPTO serial 79006457

E-TREES.JAPAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3272488Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2007
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-TREES.JAPAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H. GREGER

Yoon S. Ham LOWE HAUPTMAN HAM & BERNER LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers, notebook computers, desk-top computers; computer programs for use with computer servers for the purpose of operating the computer server system; computer programs for internet transmission of data; computer peripherals; electronic semi-conductors; electronic intergrated circuits excluding those carrying computer programs; encoded magnetic cards, sheets and tapes all for use in connection with computer servers, and for use with internet transmission of data; pre-recorded video discs and tapes in the fields of computer servers, internet transmission of data, and movie, television and music industries; electronic publications, namely books and magazines in the fields of computer servers, internet transmission of data, and movie, television and entertainment industriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer programming for others; creating and maintaining web sites for others; computer rental; and rental of computer softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 5, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 7, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 26, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 13, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 25, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 7, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 7, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance